Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 02:18

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Aaron Rodgers Is Married Now - The Cut
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Hegseth warns China poses 'imminent' threat to Taiwan and urges Asia to boost defence - BBC
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
DF Weekly: Why would Microsoft "sideline" its next generation handheld? - Eurogamer
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
I am glad you enjoyed my pictures. Do you have any photos to share?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Switch 2’s promising start hides an uncertain future - The Verge
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Private Japanese spacecraft aims to land in the moon's 'Sea of Cold' this week - Space
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Job openings rise in middle of trade wars, but businesses are slower to hire - MarketWatch